foreign policy
Since 2020, after the border clashes in Galwan, investment from countries sharing a land border with India (mainly China) needs government approval, and many Chinese apps were banned. Indian electronics, solar and EV manufacturers depend on Chinese components and machinery, and some industry voices and economic advisers have suggested easing curbs to attract investment and technology. Security agencies remain cautious.
Take a stance to see what people think.
Results open up once you've answered, so they don't sway you. 727 people have taken a stance so far.
Mark an argument convincing even if you took the other side. It shows which points persuade people across the divide.
Chinese investment could boost manufacturing and jobs.
India already imports huge amounts of Chinese components. Letting Chinese firms manufacture in India would create jobs and skills here instead.
Countries such as Vietnam and Mexico have grown manufacturing exports with Chinese investment while managing security concerns.
Case-by-case approval has slowed investment even in harmless sectors, discouraging Indian companies that want Chinese partners.
National security must come before investment.
The border dispute is unresolved and China is a strategic rival. Investment in telecom, power, data and infrastructure carries security risks.
Chinese firms could dominate Indian markets and suppliers, as has happened in some sectors, making India more dependent rather than less.
Investment curbs are leverage in relations with China and should not be given up without something in return.
Whether economic gains from Chinese capital and know-how outweigh the security and strategic risks. Possible middle paths include allowing investment in some sectors with local partners and technology transfer while keeping sensitive sectors closed.
